Research method

A research process you can inspect

Optional specialist modules gather evidence. Bull/Bear debate, Research Manager, Trader, risk review, and Portfolio Manager always run. The hosted product follows the deployed research graph, which may differ from upstream experiments.

What TradingAgents Report research is

TradingAgents Report research is a dated multi-agent equity research workflow: optional evidence modules, bull/bear debate, research and trading plans, risk review, and a final Portfolio Manager five-tier rating. It produces research references only—not brokerage access, order placement, or personalized investment advice.

Research team

Twelve roles, one auditable process

Each role owns a distinct question. Together they make the evidence, disagreement, risk review, and final Portfolio Manager conclusion inspectable.

Evidence analysts

Optional modules collect market, fundamentals, news, and sentiment evidence.

  • Market Analyst

    Market Analyst

    Reads price action, volume, and technicals to map trend and key levels.

  • Fundamentals Analyst

    Fundamentals Analyst

    Assesses financial quality, valuation, and business drivers.

  • News Analyst

    News Analyst

    Tracks catalysts, filings, and macro headlines that move the name.

  • Sentiment Analyst

    Sentiment Analyst

    Watches market mood, social buzz, and narrative shifts.

Research debate

Bull and Bear researchers challenge the thesis before the Research Manager forms a conclusion.

  • Bull Researcher

    Bull Researcher

    Builds the upside case and answers objections with evidence.

  • Bear Researcher

    Bear Researcher

    Stresses risks and counter-evidence against the bull thesis.

  • Research Manager

    Research Manager

    Judges the debate and forms an actionable research conclusion.

Trading team

Turns the research conclusion into a directional plan.

  • Trader

    Trader

    Turns research into a clear directional trading plan.

Risk review

Aggressive, Conservative, and Neutral views stress-test the plan.

  • Aggressive Analyst

    Aggressive Analyst

    Emphasizes upside and opportunity cost for a bolder stance.

  • Conservative Analyst

    Conservative Analyst

    Prioritizes downside protection and steady risk control.

  • Neutral Analyst

    Neutral Analyst

    Balances reward and risk into a practical middle path.

Portfolio decision

Synthesizes the full run into the final rating and recommendation.

  • Portfolio Manager

    Portfolio Manager

    Synthesizes every view into the final rating and recommendation.

Optional evidence modules

Market, Sentiment, News, and Fundamentals can be selected per job. Selected analysts run in a fixed order from the confirmed listing and analysis date.

Market analysis

Price structure, volume, and technical indicators establish the market context available at the selected analysis date.

Sentiment analysis

Public discussion and related sentiment signals can challenge the evidence. They do not replace filings, prices, or dated news.

News analysis

Company developments and macro conditions are filtered to the research timeline rather than treated as timeless facts.

Fundamentals analysis

Financial quality, valuation, and business drivers are assessed where configured data sources can support them for that date.

Always-on debate, plan, and risk review

After selected analysts finish, the following roles always run. The Trader proposal is an intermediate step; only the Portfolio Manager rating is the product conclusion.

Bull and Bear researchers

Opposing researchers examine specialist reports and surface conflicting interpretations before synthesis.

Research Manager and Trader

The Research Manager drafts an investment plan. The Trader then proposes Buy, Hold, or Sell. That action is not the final public rating.

Risk voices and Portfolio Manager

Aggressive, Conservative, and Neutral analysts stress-test the plan. The Portfolio Manager issues Buy, Overweight, Hold, Underweight, or Sell.

What the report contains

A finished job surfaces the Portfolio Manager decision first, then the supporting Markdown from every role that ran.

Five-tier final rating

Buy, Overweight, Hold, Underweight, or Sell. Do not treat the Trader action as the product conclusion.

Structured decision card

Conviction, reference price and date, position guidance, entry or add zones, stop or reduce level, target, bull and bear cases, key risks, invalidation, and watch items.

Full role Markdown

Specialist, debate, trader, risk, and manager write-ups remain available under the decision card for audit and export in the product app.

Models and deployment capability

Quick-think and deep-think models come from the administrator's open catalog and stay on the same provider for one job. Framework support for a provider does not mean every model is enabled here.

Method FAQ

Common questions about the research method

Does the Portfolio Manager rating tell me what to buy or sell?

No. The five-tier Portfolio Manager rating is the final research assessment for the selected analysis date. It is not a brokerage instruction, personalized advice, or an automated trade.

What is the difference between the Trader action and the Portfolio Manager rating?

The Trader proposes an intermediate Buy, Hold, or Sell plan after the research debate. The Portfolio Manager then issues the product’s final five-tier rating: Buy, Overweight, Hold, Underweight, or Sell. Public report cards use the Portfolio Manager rating only.

Why does every run need an analysis date?

The analysis date is the data boundary for prices, fundamentals, and news. Without it, historical research can accidentally use later information. Some sentiment inputs may still reflect live-at-run data, so missing or uncertain fields should stay visible.